超越维度存在是位于维度之外的能力。在大部分情况下，"超越维度"指角色不受空间和时间限制。换句话说，一个超越维度的角色无论怎样都不占用任何体积，他也不在时空中占用一个位置，他的持续存在也不会在时空中留下痕迹。因此，它们与零维角色大不相同，零维角色只是在任何维度下都没有延伸，但仍然在空间内占据某个位置。
此外，存在维度的结构总是由材料复合而成。它可以被可以分为不同的部分，并可以表示为这些部分的总和。但无维度的实体完全没有组成部分，从任何物理意义上讲它都不是复合体。实际上，尽管零维点没有可分的空间部分，但它仍然可以作为更大空间内复合结构的一部分，相反无维度的结构则不能。
从描绘角度来看，他们也可以被表现为将一个较低的维度视为虚构，从而在本体上超越其维度，同时仍以高于其较高现实的本土维度概念运作。
更少见的情况是，它也可以指那些简单地超越常规维度的角色，可以说是“以尺寸的超越”。例如，通过体现所有可能维度空间的集合，而该集合本身并不是像其组成部分那样的维度空间。
Types
Type 1: Characters who lack spatiotemporal features entirely, while not actually being superior to them in nature. They are simply ontologically different from any dimensional construct, but can ultimately still be comparable to dimension-bound entities in terms of raw power. Due to being aspatial and atemporal, they are obviously immune to conventional Spatial Manipulation and Time Manipulation, and since they are not part of the spacetime continuum, they usually have Acausality (Type 1).
Note, however, that simply being incorporeal is not sufficient for this ability. The character must specifically not be a part of space at all, while incorporeal beings (e.g. Ghosts) can still have extension in it, despite their lack of bodies.
Type 2: Characters who exceed conventional dimensionality by possessing an excess of size. This refers to an object (or collections of objects) is simply too large to be a dimensional space in the conventional sense. For instance, the Universe of Sets, which contains all mathematical set-structures, and therefore all spaces in which dimensions are defined, being larger than all such spaces. Characters of this nature are Low 1-A and fall under this type.
Type 3: Characters who exceed dimensionality through a qualitative superiority over lesser things, which is to say: Ontologically surpassing all the contents of a lower reality, and being above their physical composition and differentiation. Characters of this nature don't simply lack all physicality and composition (As in Type 1), but surpass it altogether, being of a wholly superior nature that is not reachable by lower states of existence. But as stated at the beginning of the page, these beings can still operate on a higher notion of dimensionality that is fundamental to their own nature and reality.
Notes
As a default, statements of being "above dimensions" are set at Low 1-A, and the same is applied to statements indicating superiority over "All of space and time," and similar. However, if they are applied to realms that can be inferred to surpass the very composition of the lower reality (e.g. Realms that are, themselves, non-composite, such as conceptual domains, or often, voids of nothingness), then 1-A is the most appropriate rating for them.
Keep in mind that Type 3 Beyond-Dimensional Existence is not simply a combination of a non-dimensional state of existence and greater raw power than all dimensional structures in a cosmology – though that is a necessary condition to qualify for it, it is not a sufficient one. Instead, the non-dimensional state of existence must be the direct cause of the character/realm's superiority over dimensions. A simple example being a realm that is stated to lack space, time and physicality entirely, but is nonetheless shown as being "vaster" than physical reality in some way. Common imagery of this includes the universe as a small object encompassed in a wider backdrop.
A void of nothingness is not necessarily 1-A; it is only 1-A if it encompasses or is vaster than reality in a qualitative manner. For example, imagine a void so distinct from reality that it lacks space-time, not because it’s simply empty, but because it is beyond dimensionality and space-time itself. In comparison, the reality we know would be even lesser than a drop of water in an ocean. In a context like this, the void possesses qualitative superiority, which is why it's referred to as a void of nothingness. no composition from our reality holds significance or meaning within it.
Both Type 2 and Type 3 can contain layers within themselves. For example, Type 3 begins at baseline 1-A. If a being, through qualitative superiority exists above the reality and nature of baseline 1-A, it would occupy a higher layer and thereby making the Type 3 also higher. Essentially, there is a direct connection between Type 3 and where a character or object stands qualitatively.